As the CEO of Broadstone Risks, I want to share some insights and thoughts following a recent inquiry conducted into the police's use of Live Facial Recognition (LFR) technology in England and Wales. Our commitment to ensuring the balance between technological advancement and individual rights guides our perspective on this critical issue.
Recently, an investigative report has been brought to light, addressing the deployment of LFR technology by law enforcement. This report raises significant concerns regarding the absence of a solid legal framework underpinning the use of such technology. Initiated in the latter part of last year, this investigation builds upon concerns previously highlighted in a comprehensive report focused on the introduction of new technologies within the justice system.
LFR technology operates by comparing individuals captured through live video feeds against a pre-established database to identify potential matches. However, the report underscores a glaring lack of uniform standards and regulatory oversight governing the use of LFR, alongside a noticeable inconsistency in training for police forces utilizing this technology.
The report expresses profound concern over the transparency of LFR usage by the police, emphasizing the necessity for clear communication with the public regarding when and where LFR technology is deployed. Despite recognizing LFR's potential in aiding law enforcement to detain criminals, there's a strong call for its use to be reined in, advocating for enhanced scrutiny and accountability.
The central government is urged to take immediate action to address these concerns, underlining the importance of fostering public trust and support for the technology's use.
Echoing the sentiments of the committee's chair, the absence of a clear legal basis for LFR's use is troubling. With technology advancing at a breakneck pace, there's an urgent need for regulations that are not only comprehensive but also sufficiently forward-looking to remain relevant. The potential for LFR technology to extend its reach significantly, possibly encompassing vast populations, underscores the necessity for a thoughtful and measured approach to its application.
The report concludes by reflecting on the UK's position relative to other democracies regarding the rapid adoption of LFR technology, questioning the disparity in regulatory approaches.
At Broadstone Risks, we stand by the principle that technology should serve the public good while respecting individual privacy and rights. The findings of this report highlight a critical juncture at which we must collectively evaluate and steer the course of technological use in law enforcement. It's imperative that we establish a robust legal and regulatory framework that not only supports law enforcement efforts but also safeguards the principles of privacy and trust that are foundational to our society.
